Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Testing realism of software breast phantoms: texture analysis of synthetic mammograms
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

Software breast phantoms have been developed for pre-clinical validation of breast imaging systems. Realism is of great importance for the acceptance and the range of applications of breast phantoms. In this paper we have assessed the phantom realism based upon the analysis of mammographic texture properties. Texture analysis is of interest since it reflects the spatial tissue distribution, which is known to correlate with breast cancer risk. We compared texture properties of synthetic mammograms generated using software breast phantoms with clinical data. A total of 133 phantom images were synthesized using software phantoms developed at the University of Pennsylvania. The phantoms were designed using two different anatomy simulation methods: an octree-based recursive partitioning method and a region growing method. The synthetic images were generated assuming a clinically used acquisition geometry and mono-energetic x-ray beam with no scatter. The clinical data included 60 anonymized mammograms selected retrospectively from screening cases at the University of Pennsylvania. The same postprocessing was applied to clinical and phantom images. The texture analysis was performed using fully automated software which extracts a battery of features from analyzed images. The histograms of texture properties extracted from phantom images were compared with those from clinical mammograms, separately for the two anatomy simulation methods. The histogram agreement was quantified using symmetrized Kulback-Leibler divergence. We observed good agreement for most of the analyzed 25 features. In more than a half of the features, the octree-based simulation method yielded better agreement with clinical data as compared with the region growing method.

Paper Details

Date Published: 19 March 2013
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging, 866824 (19 March 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2008173
Show Author Affiliations
Predrag R. Bakic, Univ. of Pennsylvania (United States)
Brad Keller, Univ. of Pennsylvania (United States)
Yuanjie Zheng, Univ. of Pennsylvania (United States)
Yan Wang, Univ. of Pennsylvania (United States)
James C. Gee, Univ. of Pennsylvania (United States)
Despina Kontos, Univ. of Pennsylvania (United States)
Andrew D. A. Maidment, Univ. of Pennsylvania (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8668:
Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging
Robert M. Nishikawa; Bruce R. Whiting; Christoph Hoeschen, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top