Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Born or Kirchoff migration/inversion: what is the Earth's point of view?
Author(s): Wafik B. Beydoun; Side Jin
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Born and Kirchhoff approximations are frequently used in seismic imaging and have different assumptions. A Born and a Kirchhoff prestack depth migration/inversion techniques formulated in the space-time domain are briefly reviewed. These are used and compared on a field data collected above a hydrocarbon reservoir. Synthetic tests although interesting could not provide the answer to the question: can the physics (measurements) distinguish between these two approximations? Multiparameter images (relative changes in P-wave and S-wave impedances) produced by these two m/i techniques are presented along with their differences. Forward modeling with a calibrated ray-Born modeling technique is performed on resulting images from the Born and Kirchhoff m/i. Synthetics are compared to the field data. A residual energy function computed as a function of shot point number appraises which approximation represents best the real data. Although differences are small, results show that for this real data case the Kirchhoff approximation is more physical than the Born approximation.

Paper Details

Date Published: 23 September 1994
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 2301, Mathematical Methods in Geophysical Imaging II, (23 September 1994); doi: 10.1117/12.187498
Show Author Affiliations
Wafik B. Beydoun, ELF Geoscience Research Ctr. (United Kingdom)
Side Jin, ELF Geoscience Research Ctr. (United Kingdom)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2301:
Mathematical Methods in Geophysical Imaging II
Siamak Hassanzadeh, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top