Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Human and quasi-Bayesian observers of images limited by quantum noise, object-variability, and artifacts
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Many investigators have pointed out the need for performance measures that describe how well the images produced by a medical imaging system aid the end user in performing a particular diagnostic task. To this end we have investigated a variety of imaging tasks to determine the applicability of Bayesian and related strategies for predicting human performance. We have compared Bayesian and human classification performance for tasks involving a number of sources of decision-variable spread, including quantum fluctuations contained in the data set, inherent biological variability within each patient class, and deterministic artifacts due to limited data sets.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 April 1994
PDF: 11 pages
Proc. SPIE 2166, Medical Imaging 1994: Image Perception, (1 April 1994); doi: 10.1117/12.171740
Show Author Affiliations
Kyle J. Myers, Ctr. for Devices and Radiological Health/FDA (United States)
Robert F. Wagner, Ctr. for Devices and Radiological Health/FDA (United States)
Kenneth M. Hanson, Los Alamos National Lab. (United States)
Harrison H. Barrett, Arizona Health Sciences Ctr./Univ. of Arizona (United States)
Jannick P. Rolland, Univ. of North Carolina/Chapel Hill (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2166:
Medical Imaging 1994: Image Perception
Harold L. Kundel, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top