Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Flat-panel fluorescent lamp backlights with controlled illumination angle: backlighting optics at the thermodynamic limit
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

Interest in improving backlight performance is increasing rapidly, driven by the large world-wide investment in high-perfonnance LCD display screens. At the simplest level, afl backlights consist of one or more light sources (usually tubular fluorescent lamps) and an optical system. The optical system collects the fluorescent light and causes it to pass through the LCD display screen towards the viewer. NiOptics' proprietary optical designs have been used to increase flat-panel backlight luminance by a factor of 2 to 2.5 over comparable conventional systems. This dramatic improvement results from matching illumination to preferred viewing angles. The maximum theoretical improvement is quantified by deriving the fundamental thermodynamic limits which restrict two key backlight sub-systems, the light source and the distribution panel. These sub-system analyses are then combined to show thesurprisingly complex set oftrade-offs intrinsic to all backlight designs, completely independent ofthe specific device architecture. Specifically, we show that backlight luminance has an upper bound given by Po ILot< x— D1D2Sin90t cxlcclL hsinOi 1—cx In this expression L0t is the output luminance, øout is the vertical output half-angle, P is the lamp luminous output, Di and D2 are the linear dimensions of the backlight emission surface, h is the backlight thickness, dL is the lamp I.D., and a is the lamp's effective self-absorptivity coefficient. Two limiting special cases of this expression are developed to illustrate the design trade-offs. The comparisondemonstrates that superior performance requires that angular reduction be achieved within the distribution panel. Finally, we compare these two theoretical limits to NiOptics' experimental results. The results show that NiOptics proprietary backlights perform at 66% of the theoretical limit, with shortfall due primarily to material absorption and reflection losses.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 November 1993
PDF: 1 pages
Proc. SPIE 2016, Nonimaging Optics: Maximum-Efficiency Light Transfer II, (1 November 1993); doi: 10.1117/12.161942
Show Author Affiliations
Benjamin A. Jacobson, NiOptics Corp. (United States)
Roland Winston, NiOptics Corp. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2016:
Nonimaging Optics: Maximum-Efficiency Light Transfer II
Roland Winston; Robert L. Holman, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top