Share Email Print
cover

Optical Engineering

Accuracy of overlay measurements: tool and mark asymmetry effects
Author(s): Alexander Starikov; Daniel J. Coleman; Patricia J. Larson; Alexander D. Lopata; William A. Muth
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $20.00 $25.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Definitions of centerline and centerline overlay (O/L) are built on the implicit assumptions of certain symmetries. Verification of these symmetries, and the use of redundancies built into the design of O/L measurement marks, can estimate the relative accuracy of O/L measurements, even in the absence of certified reference materials (standards). Verification carried out as of paired comparison is shown to be very effective; in addition, it constitutes the basis for data culling. Several sources of O/L measurement inaccuracy, associated with O/L measurement tools and with O/L measurement marks, are pointed out and some are illustrated using modeling. A simple measure of tool-related inaccuracy, tool-induced shift (TIS), is proposed and utilized as a performance estimate of O/L measurement tools relative to accuracy. Inaccuracies of O/L measurements, caused by O/L measurement tools and marks, on the order of 100 nm, are observed and their causes identified. Examples are given of significant improvements in accuracy. A roadmap toward accurate O/L measurement is outlined. This approach is also applicable to alignment systems.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 June 1992
PDF: 13 pages
Opt. Eng. 31(6) doi: 10.1117/12.56172
Published in: Optical Engineering Volume 31, Issue 6
Show Author Affiliations
Alexander Starikov, IBM Corp. (United States)
Daniel J. Coleman
Patricia J. Larson, IBM Corp. (United States)
Alexander D. Lopata
William A. Muth, IBM Corp. (United States)


© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top