Share Email Print

Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS

Patterning critical dimension control for advanced logic nodes
Author(s): Bertrand Le-Gratiet; Jean De-Caunes; Maxime Gatefait; Auguste Lam; Alain Ostrovsky; Jonathan Planchot; Vincent Farys; Julien Ducoté; Marc Mikolajczak; Vincent Morin; Nicolas Chojnowski; Frank Sundermann; Alice Pelletier; Regis Bouyssou; Cedric Monget; Jean-Damien Chapon; Bastien Orlando; Laurene Babaud; Céline Lapeyre; Emek Yesilada; Anna Szucs; Jean-Christophe Michel; Latifa Desvoivres; Onintza Ros Bengoechea; Pascal Gouraud
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $20.00 $25.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Patterning process control has undergone major evolutions over the last few years. Critical dimension, focus, and overlay control require deep insight into process-variability understanding to be properly apprehended. Process setup is a complex engineering challenge. In the era of mid k1 lithography (<0.6), process windows were quite comfortable with respect to tool capabilities, therefore, some sources of variability were, if not ignored, at least considered as negligible. The low k1 patterning (<0.4) era has broken down this concept. For the most advanced nodes, engineers need to consider such a wide set of information that holistic processing is often mentioned as the way to handle the setup of the process and its variability. The main difficulty is to break down process-variability sources in detail and be aware that what could have been formerly negligible has become a very significant contributor requiring control down to a fraction of a nanometer. The scope of this article is to highlight that today, engineers have to zoom deeper into variability. Even though process tools have greatly improved their capabilities, diminishing process windows require more than tool-intrinsic optimization. Process control and variability compensations are major contributors to success. Some examples will be used to explain how complex the situation is and how interlinked processes are today.

Paper Details

Date Published: 10 April 2015
PDF: 11 pages
J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS 14(2) 021103 doi: 10.1117/1.JMM.14.2.021103
Published in: Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS Volume 14, Issue 2
Show Author Affiliations
Bertrand Le-Gratiet, STMicroelectronics (France)
Jean De-Caunes, STMicroelectronics (France)
Maxime Gatefait, STMicroelectronics (France)
Auguste Lam, STMicroelectronics (France)
Alain Ostrovsky, STMicroelectronics (France)
Jonathan Planchot, STMicroelectronics (France)
Vincent Farys, STMicroelectronics (France)
Julien Ducoté, STMicroelectronics (France)
Marc Mikolajczak, STMicroelectronics (France)
Vincent Morin, STMicroelectronics (France)
Nicolas Chojnowski, STMicroelectronics (France)
Frank Sundermann, STMicroelectronics (France)
Alice Pelletier, STMicroelectronics (France)
Regis Bouyssou, STMicroelectronics (France)
Cedric Monget, STMicroelectronics (France)
Jean-Damien Chapon, STMicroelectronics (France)
Bastien Orlando, STMicroelectronics (France)
Laurene Babaud, STMicroelectronics (France)
Céline Lapeyre, Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique (France)
Emek Yesilada, STMicroelectronics (France)
Anna Szucs, STMicroelectronics (France)
Jean-Christophe Michel, STMicroelectronics (France)
Latifa Desvoivres, Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique (France)
Onintza Ros Bengoechea, STMicroelectronics (France)
Pascal Gouraud, STMicroelectronics (France)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top