Share Email Print
cover

Journal of Applied Remote Sensing

Comparative analysis for detecting areas with building damage from several destructive earthquakes using satellite synthetic aperture radar images
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $20.00 $25.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Earthquakes that have caused large-scale damage in developed areas, such as the 1994 Northridge and 1995 Kobe events, remind us of the importance of making quick damage assessments in order to facilitate the resumption of normal activities and restoration planning. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) can be used to record physical aspects of the Earth's surface under any weather conditions, making it a powerful tool in the development of an applicable method for assessing damage following natural disasters. Detailed building damage data recorded on the ground following the 1995 Kobe earthquake may provide an invaluable opportunity to investigate the relationship between the backscattering properties and the degree of damage. This paper aims to investigate the differences between the backscattering coefficients and the correlations derived from pre- and post-earthquake SAR intensity images to smoothly detect areas with building damage. This method was then applied to SAR images recorded over the areas affected by the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake in Turkey, the 2001 Gujarat earthquake in India, and the 2003 Boumerdes earthquake in Algeria. The accuracy of the proposed method was examined and confirmed by comparing the results of the SAR analyses with the field survey data.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 November 2010
PDF: 15 pages
J. Appl. Remote Sens. 4(1) 041867 doi: 10.1117/1.3525581
Published in: Journal of Applied Remote Sensing Volume 4, Issue 1
Show Author Affiliations
Masashi Matsuoka, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (Japan)
Fumio Yamazaki, Chiba Univ. (Japan)


© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top