Share Email Print
cover

Journal of Biomedical Optics

Quantitative measurement of attenuation coefficients of bladder biopsies using optical coherence tomography for grading urothelial carcinoma of the bladder
Author(s): Evelyne C. Cauberg; Daniel Martijn M. de Bruin; Dirk J. Faber; Theo M. de Reijke; Mike Visser; Jean J. de la Rosette; Ton G. van Leeuwen
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $20.00 $25.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Real-time grading of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC) is clinically important, but the current standard for grading (histopathology) cannot provide this information. Based on optical coherence tomography (OCT)-measured optical attenuation (µt), the grade of bladder UC could potentially be assessed in real time. We evaluate ex vivo whether µt differs between different grades of UC and benign bladder tissue. Human bladder tissue specimens are examined ex vivo by 850-nm OCT using dynamic focusing. Three observers independently determine the µt from the OCT images, and three pathologists independently review the corresponding histology slides. For both methods, a consensus diagnosis is made. We include 76 OCT scans from 54 bladder samples obtained in 20 procedures on 18 patients. The median (interquartile range) µt of benign tissue is 5.75 mm−1 (4.77 to 6.14) versus 5.52 mm−1 (3.47 to 5.90), 4.85 mm−1 (4.25 to 6.50), and 5.62 mm−1 (5.01 to 6.29) for grade 1, 2, and 3 UC, respectively (p = 0.732). Interobserver agreement of histopathology is "substantial" [Kappa 0.62, 95% confidence interval (IC) 0.54 to 0.70] compared to "almost perfect" [interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.92] for OCT. Quantitative OCT analysis (by µt) does not detect morphological UC changes. This may be due to factors typical for an ex-vivo experimental setting.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 November 2010
PDF: 6 pages
J. Biomed. Opt. 15(6) 066013 doi: 10.1117/1.3512206
Published in: Journal of Biomedical Optics Volume 15, Issue 6
Show Author Affiliations
Evelyne C. Cauberg, Univ. van Amsterdam (Netherlands)
Daniel Martijn M. de Bruin, Univ. van Amsterdam (Netherlands)
Dirk J. Faber, Univ. van Amsterdam (Netherlands)
Theo M. de Reijke, Univ. van Amsterdam (Netherlands)
Mike Visser, Univ. van Amsterdam (Netherlands)
Jean J. de la Rosette, Univ. van Amsterdam (Netherlands)
Ton G. van Leeuwen, Univ. Twente (Netherlands)


© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top