Share Email Print
cover

Journal of Biomedical Optics

Characteristics of the human isoplanatic patch and implications for adaptive optics retinal imaging
Author(s): Phillip Bedggood; Mary Daaboul; Ross A. Ashman; George G. Smith; Andrew Metha
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $20.00 $25.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Conventional adaptive optics enables correction of high-order aberrations of the eye, but only for a single retinal point. When imaging extended regions of the retina, aberrations increase away from this point and degrade image quality. The zone over which aberrations do not change significantly is called the "isoplanatic patch." Literature concerning the human isoplanatic patch is incomplete. We determine foveal isoplanatic patch characteristics by performing Hartmann-Shack aberrometry in 1 deg increments in 8 directions on 7 human eyes. Using these measurements, we establish the correction quality required to yield at least 80% of the potential patch size for a given eye. Single-point correction systems (conventional adaptive optics) and multiple-point correction systems (multiconjugate adaptive optics) are simulated. Results are compared to a model eye. Using the Maréchal criterion for 555-nm light, average isoplanatic patch diameter for our subjects is 0.80±0.10 deg. The required order of aberration correction depends on desired image quality over the patch. For the more realistically achievable criterion of 0.1 μm root mean square (rms) wavefront error over a 6.0-mm pupil, correction to at least sixth order is recommended for all adaptive optics systems. The most important aberrations to target for a multiconjugate correction are defocus, astigmatism, and coma.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 March 2008
PDF: 7 pages
J. Biomed. Opt. 13(2) 024008 doi: 10.1117/1.2907211
Published in: Journal of Biomedical Optics Volume 13, Issue 2
Show Author Affiliations
Phillip Bedggood, The Univ. of Melbourne (Australia)
Mary Daaboul, The Univ. of Melbourne (Australia)
Ross A. Ashman, The Univ. of Melbourne (Australia)
George G. Smith, The Univ. of Melbourne (Australia)
Andrew Metha, The Univ. of Melbourne (Australia)


© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top