Share Email Print
cover

Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS

Line edge roughness and intrinsic bias for two methacrylate polymer resist systems
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $20.00 $25.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Line edge roughness (LER) and intrinsic bias of 193-nm photoresist based on two methacrylate polymers are evaluated over a range of base concentration. Roughness is characterized as a function of the image log slope of the aerial image, the gradient in photoacid concentration, and the gradient in polymer protecting groups. Use of the polymer protection gradient as a characteristic roughness metric accounts for the effects of base concentration. Results demonstrate that a methacrylate terpolymer exhibits an advantage over the copolymer resist by achieving lower roughness at smaller values for the polymer protection gradient, resulting in lower LER for patterning. Intrinsic bias is found to be a function of the concentration of base. Process window analysis demonstrates that a greater depth of focus can be achieved for resists with low intrinsic bias. However, a tradeoff in depth of focus with LER is found. Spectral analysis indicates resists with greater intrinsic bias exhibit greater correlation lengths. Systems with greater intrinsic bias demonstrate lesser roughness for patterned features, with a minimum roughness achieved at maximum intrinsic bias. Kinetics of deprotection are modeled to calculate the chemical contrast of each resist. Resists exhibiting the greatest chemical contrast are identified as materials that generate the least roughness.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 April 2006
PDF: 16 pages
J. Micro/Nanolith. 5(2) 023001 doi: 10.1117/1.2200675
Published in: Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS Volume 5, Issue 2
Show Author Affiliations
Adam R. Pawloski, Affymetrix, Inc. (United States)
Alden Acheta, Spansion Inc. (United States)
Harry J. Levinson, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (United States)
Timothy B. Michaelson, Applied Materials, Inc. (United States)
Andrew Jamieson, The Univ. of Texas at Austin (United States)
Yukio Nishimura, The Univ. of Texas at Austin (United States)
Carlton Grant Willson, The Univ. of Texas at Austin (United States)


© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top