Share Email Print

Optical Engineering

Determination of the conditions under which the responsivity of quantum-well infrared photodetectors becomes background-flux-dependent
Author(s): K. F. Cuff; Thomas N. Casselman; Douglas C. Arrington; John Edward Hubbs
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $20.00 $25.00

Paper Abstract

Quantum-well infrared photodetectors (QWIPs) are trapping-mode photodetectors, and it is trapping that leads to an inherent problem: QWIPs' responsivity can be background-dependent under low-background conditions. We have determined that the source of the dependence is a relaxation process due solely to dielectric effects (dielectric relaxation), which results in a long time constant for recovery to steady state after a pulse of radiation is detected. We have analyzed responsivity-versus-frequency measurements on QWIPs published separately by Arrington et al. We have determined the value of the background flux for which significant background dependence occurs. For a given sensor integration time i (frame time for a staring sensor, dwell time for a scanning sensor), we calculated the response as a function of an exponential time constant. Fitting the calculated response to the measured data, we extracted values for the exponential time constant. We then determined the lower bound of background flux, BL, above which the total responsivity will be less than 1% background-dependent. The value of BL for a typical QWIP detector is such that BLi lies between 1012 and 1013 photons cm–2. Practically, when significant background dependence occurs, it is essentially impossible to calibrate a QWIP-based focal plane array. And this, together with their the inherently low sensitivity and low required operating temperature (compared with HgCdTe detectors), makes QWIPs a poor choice for many low-background spaceborne sensors.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 March 2005
PDF: 11 pages
Opt. Eng. 44(3) 036403 doi: 10.1117/1.1871961
Published in: Optical Engineering Volume 44, Issue 3
Show Author Affiliations
K. F. Cuff, Lockheed Palo Alto Research Lab. (United States)
Thomas N. Casselman, Lockheed Martin Palo Alto Advanced Technology Ctr. (United States)
Douglas C. Arrington, Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. (United States)
John Edward Hubbs, Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. (United States)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top