Share Email Print
cover

Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS

Optical vortex masks for via levels
Author(s): Marc David Levenson; Takeaki Ebihara; Grace Dai; Yasutaka Morikawa; Naoya Hayashi; Sze Meng Tan
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $20.00 $25.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

In an optical vortex, the wavefront spirals like a corkscrew, rather than forming planes or spheres. Since any nonzero optical amplitude must have a well-defined phase, the axis of a vortex is always dark. Printed in negative resist at 248 nm and NA≥0.63, optical vortices and optical vortex arrays produce contact holes with 64 nmk1<0.4), depending on exposure dose. Arrays of vortices with kpitch>0.6 can be patterned using a chromeless phase-edge mask composed of rectangles with nominal phases of 0, 90, 180, and 270 deg. Lithography simulation and resist exposures have demonstrated process windows with ≈10%Elat and ~400-nm depth of focus (DOF) for 85-nm CDs at 210-nm pitch with σ=0.15, but the developed contacts are somewhat elliptical. No significant surface development has appeared due to phase-edge printing. However, the spacewidth alternation phenomenon familiar from linear chromeless phase-edge lithography does cause small positional errors for vortex vias, and each of the four vortices in the repeating pattern may behave somewhat differently through focus, potentially limiting the common process window. Smaller CDs and pitches are possible with shorter wavelength and larger NA, while larger pitches give rise to larger CDs. At pitch >0.6 μm, the vortices begin to print independently for σ≥0.3. Such "independent" vortices have a quasi-isofocal dose that gives rise to 110-nm contacts with Elat>14% and DOF >400 nm. In an actual chip design, unwanted vortices and phase step images would be erased from the resist pattern by exposing the wafer with a second, more conventional, bright-field trim mask. Compared to other ways of producing deep subwavelength contacts, the vortex via process reduces the lithography and process control challenges.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 April 2004
PDF: 12 pages
J. Micro/Nanolith. 3(2) doi: 10.1117/1.1683304
Published in: Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS Volume 3, Issue 2
Show Author Affiliations
Marc David Levenson, Microlithography World (United States)
Takeaki Ebihara, Canon Inc. (Japan)
Grace Dai, Sigma-C Inc. (United States)
Yasutaka Morikawa, Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd. (Japan)
Naoya Hayashi, Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd. (Japan)
Sze Meng Tan, Picarro, Inc. (United States)


© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top